|
Ron Chappell — The Real Twickenham Challenge:
Accommodation Already Available
26 April 2003
Interesting to note that the Richmond upon Thames Council is proposing
to destroy the existing Twickenham Riverside Swimming Pool changing
rooms in order to provide 2 seats, a raised pathway, hard landscaping
and planting.
At the same time it has had several organisations wishing to provide
facilities under the banner of the Twickenham Challenge.
The latest count is 5 from swimming to museums to martial arts,
the Scouts and Duke of Edinburgh's Award scheme. All excellent
proposals, all will be competing for one new building which under
the rules will occupy 15 to 20% of the site: a building the size
of the existing pool.
In the meantime for 5 years our Council will spend £480,000
on the raised pathway and a children's playground with a new security
fence round the rest of the site.
At present the maintenance of this site costs £50,000 per
year. This expenditure will continue, in addition the long term
scheme has around £200,000 allocated to it for advice and
publicity before anything gets built. £680,000 for a fenced
off site, a children's playground and a book of rules.
In addition the 5 challengers will have to endeavour to raise the
money to build their chosen accommodation, so that one can win.
This crazy state of affairs comes about because the inability to
realise that if existing buildings exist the sensible thing to
do is to use them. In the best tradition of conservation, refurbish
adapt conserve ethical green policies and much more of a challenge
to all the building professions than new build.
Make use of what is already there: all 5 organisations could be
housed in existing buildings on site, money saved in building costs,
not to mention reports, security fencing, lighting and its daily
maintenance.
The TRTG scheme proposed this and was rejected on cost £650,000
and risk. So the alternative is fine words, a 5 year playground
and limited work for £680,000.
No proper public discussion or use of the site — only reports,
rule books and continued expenditure to keep this public amenity
closed. The same story for the past 20 years money spent on proposals
schemes and reports. The real challenge was there but unfortunately
the will had gone.
Think back to the days when this Council had the guts to build
its own swimming pool because the people wanted one. Today it cannot
even let it become open space and used by all those organisations
who are providing a service to the community but can find funds
to keep it closed.
Ron Chappell
Twickenham
^top
|