|
|
18 December 2002
The Government Office for London have notified MacCormac Jamieson
Prichard, as the agents for Dawnay Day, that because they failed
to submit an Environmental Statement (that is, an Environmental
Impact Assessment), the Inquiry into the Dawnay Day scheme
will be cancelled. The possible planning permission granted
by the previous Council is now void.
Click here for the full
text.
13 December 2002
The first part of the Council's short-term scheme is to demolish
only the pool changing room building which fronts the river.
This provides a paved terrace in place of the building at street
level, with other landscaping works to an area of the site
at the side of Wharf Lane. Public access will only be to these
areas, approximately one quarter of the site.
Our interpretation of the Council's short
term plan:
We've also looked closely at the Council's sketches:
The estimated cost is £505,000, with the proviso that
instructions to proceed are given in Dec 2002. The timescale
is given as 15 months assuming a satisfactory planning permission
is granted in June 2003. Most of the rest of the site will
remain closed. There will be no work to any of the other buildings
or the existing toilet block.
This scheme should be judged in relation to the Terrace Group's
own already published plans and the planning permission, already
obtained, for a first floor terrace overlooking the river.
This requires only the demolition of the upper storey of the
pool changing rooms. We would keep the staircase, in order
to create a unique view from a terrace overlooking the river
frontage. (See below.)
In addition, we've allowed for landscaping works to the whole
site, creating a biodiversity garden, and installing lighting,
fencing and gates.
Our cost of £650,000 includes the cost of providing the
enabling development by working with the existing buildings.
That would bring in revenue to maintain and improve the site,
and the site could be used by the community. If given the go-ahead,
we could start now.
We intend to take the challenge, having worked hard to get
this far. Our scheme is infinitely adaptable since it has the
benefit of minor construction costs. It produces best value
from adapting an existing resource, in the best tradition of
recycling for today's use.
11 December 2002
The Council cabinet meeting decided to go ahead with a two-stage
redevelopment of the pool site.
The first part is a short-term scheme to demolish the buildings
and create a terrace to the river, at an estimated cost of £505,000.
The second phase is to build a commercial development with
public open space and a public asset.
Details of what the asset will be are to be worked out with
community involvement in a "Twickenham Challenge". (No more
information on the challenge was available at the meeting.)
See Twickenham
Online for a report of the meeting.
The Twickenham
Journal has frequent updates.
Photos of the pool site now and in better days are in the Twickenham
Online Baths History.
6 December 2002
The plans have developed from those shown
at the public meeting on 25 October, and consultation with
Council planning officers.
They deal with some of the conditions attached to the original
planning permission, and ramps and paving have been added
to assist access for the disabled.
In addition, the new submission shows where there will be
fences and gates to secure the south east and north west
boundaries.
Part of the site
layout.
Click
here to enlarge
|
The layout
of the site includes: hard and soft landscaping,
a public square, trees and a rooftop café.
The original stairs between the Terrace and Embankment
levels are kept, with a lightweight canopy over. |
|
|
There is an area designated
as a biodiversity
garden, with trees, shrubs and additional planting
to compliment those that have grown wild on the site
in its years of disuse. The public conveniences will
be retained, and there will be a pontoon. |
NEXT STAGE:
The Council will be looking at the scheme, and others, at the
Cabinet Meeting at York House, at 7.00
pm on 10 December. The Officer's
report on the Riverside is on their site, with the meeting Agenda.
(The meeting is open to the public.)
4 December 2002
PRESS RELEASE: Twickenham Society Proposals
Twickenham Riverside Terrace Group, at their
weekly meeting on Wednesday, night welcomed the new submission
to The Council from the Twickenham Society Group on the development
of the Twickenham Riverside.
"We welcome any form of 'Twickenham Challenge' to this development" said chairman
John Reekie. The Group this week put in to the council the new amendments to
the planning consent they hold, as promised at last weeks public meeting in St
Mary's parish hall.
Always open in all our discussions and planning with other
local bodies and Council Officers we are confident we meet
the Council criteria of 'public benefits' and are concerned
to keep this 'public asset' firmly in the hands of the people
of Twickenham.
We can deliver a workable and viable proposal for this important
site, by removing the top half of the old baths and refurbishing
the ground floor with affordable accommodation for community
activities and the retention of the stairway from the terrace
to the embankment. A new pontoon for river traffic is also
proposed.
25 November 2002
TWICKENHAM RIVERSIDE TERRACE GROUP PUBLIC MEETING
A packed hall at St. Mary's Parish Rooms in Twickenham on Tuesday
25 Nov listened intently as Martin Stearman went through in
detail explanation of the Twickenham Riverside Terrace Group's
submission to the cabinet of Richmond Council.
Mr Stearman showed the plans of scheme that received the
planning consent, as already held by the Group. He took the
audience through the phases of thinking about the Terrace,
ending with drawings and illustrations of the intended public
use of the site in the scheme that is now going forward to
the Council.
Mark Boggia explained how the project would be viable and
he presented the business plan. He said that the Terrace
could be constructed in 15 months or over a period of a maximum
of 5 years as funds became available. Rental income from
the limited amount of cafe and bars now proposed would be
sufficient to run and maintain the Terrace, with the the
community organisations only needing to cover the running
cost of the accommodation they occupied if they could not
contribute anything more.
Council Officer Tom McKevitt was on hand during the meeting
and gave the council's position to date as far as he was
able. The Terrace scheme will be considered, among others,
at the Council Cabinet meeting on 10 December.
After a very interesting and informative discussion from
the floor, the audience voted almost unanimously for the
scheme as presented by the Group. Only three people voted
against it, because they had some reservations, although
they agreed in principle.
As the meeting closed, John Reekie, group chairman, explained
how a charitable trust fund on behalf of the people was being
formed with prominent local people as trustees. Over 30 people
said that they're prepared to make donations when the fund
is set up and the council grants full planning and the 'go
ahead' is given.
(Report by Ken Elmes)
Update 12 October 2002
The
Terrace Group's Submission to the Council
(1.5MB in Microsoft PowerPoint format
- takes a few minutes to download)
Introduction
The submission gives an up-to-date picture with costings
for the Twickenham Terrace Garden on the existing Twickenham
riverside open air swimming pool site.
Planning permission for the basic scheme has been granted
by the Council and approved by the Secretary of State, Government
Office for London. The proposals take into account consultation
with the public and local amenity organisations, are environmentally
friendly, respect the riverside location and the historic
use and dedication of the site as public open space.
The submission illustrates a realistic programme in terms
of construction, provision for maintenance, upkeep and revenue.
These proposals will promote public use of the town centre
and its businesses, and help to maintain Twickenham's unique
riverside setting and the value of its surrounding property.
Keeping the land in public ownership ensures that there is
a flexibility of use which could allow the restoration of
original public facilities, or provision of new ones that
future generations might welcome.
At the Council elections in
May the Conservatives' policy for this site was stated to
be that it should become a landscaped public riverside open
space.
In order to assist this Council in making a decision that
is in line with what the public wish to see it is important
that you make your views known to this Council. You can contact
your Councillor or find out who he or she is via the Council's
website's Look
up your Councillor page.
To view our Submission
to the Council you will need the Microsoft PowerPoint
program, or the free PowerPoint
Viewer. Click here to download the Viewer (2.8MB)
from Microsoft.
23 September 2002
RETHINK ON THE RIVERSIDE -
the discussion paper prepared by the Twickenham Society Group of
Local Societies and interested individuals - is on the Twickenham
Riverside website.
4 August 2002
It's not clear whether Dawnay Day intend to go ahead with the Planning
Inquiry, and we're still waiting to hear whether they have agreed
to carry out the mandatory Environmental Impact Assessment that
was called for by the Government Office for London.
Letters regarding the scheme will be
accepted by the Planning Inspectorate until the date of the Inquiry
is announced. The Council report for the meeting on 30 July indicated
that it is unlikely to be before January 2003. See below for the address.
The Planning Inspectorate has agreed that the local opposition groups,
led by the Twickenham Society and including members of the Terrace
Group, will be able to have a presence at the Inquiry, with the right
to call and question witnesses.
An Environmental Impact Assessment covers
much more than the effect a development will have on the flora and
fauna in an area. It requires a thorough assessment of the social
impacts, including the effect on the population, the emissions of
noise and light, and the amount of water and air pollution resulting
from both the construction and the operation of the development.
Results have to be delivered in clear, non-technical language, and
once an EIA has been ordered it must be completed and delivered before
planning permission can be granted.
Information and a copy of the Guidelines on producing an EIA are
on the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's website:
The
Index to the Guidelines
The
Guide to Procedures - this is an Adobe Acrobat file and may take
a while to download
New
Notes on the Regulations - this page also has an address for
the printed version of the Guide
31 JULY 2002: RICHMOND COUNCIL TERMINATES NEGOTIATIONS
WITH DAWNAY DAY
At a special meeting on Tuesday 30 July, Richmond upon Thames Council's
Cabinet decided to terminate negotiations with Dawnay Day Structured
Developments on its scheme for the redevelopment of the Twickenham
Riverside.
The Cabinet has requested a detailed report for its September 2002
meeting setting out potential options for the site.
The meeting was in response to a resolution made at the May 2002
Cabinet meeting, that the implications of continuing or withdrawing
from the Dawnay Day scheme for developing the site should be explored.
The report set out three options which were:
- Continue negotiations
- Withdraw from negotiations (terminate)
- Suspend negotiations
After full deliberation, the Cabinet decided to terminate negotiations
with Dawnay Day, for the following reasons:
- Concerns at the lack of progress after a significant period
of negotiations with Dawnay Day and the likelihood that it will
not be possible to reach agreement on acceptable contractual
terms which fully deliver the Council's requirements within a
reasonable time period.
- A concern that the evidence points to a scheme with doubtful
financial viability and that a number of future events could
further impact on the viability of the scheme and/or the level
of public benefits delivered.
Councillor Tony Arbour, Leader of the Council stated: "Having
explored this matter in detail, I firmly believe that the Cabinet's
decision is in the best interests of the people of Richmond upon
Thames. I look forward to receiving the September report and to
selecting an option for redevelopment which will bring the troubled
history of this site to an end. My administration will work to
ensure that this site will be something that future generations
can be proud of."
Report courtesy of Twickenham
online. Reproduced with permission.
Twickenham Journal Report
22 July 2002 - Update
More information on the Planning Inquiry:
The date for objections now extended beyond July 9 to up until the
date of the Inquiry is announced. If you wish to write, there is
still time. The address is:
| Sian.Evans@planning-inspectorate.gsi.gov.uk
quoting reference numbers: APP/L5810/V/02/1092346 & 1092347
(The second number refers to planning permission
to demolish the pool buildings.)
Or write to:
The Planning Inspectorate
3/17 Eagle Wing
Temple Quay House
2 The Square
Temple Quay
Bristol BS1 6PN
|
It would appear advisable to concentrate the objections to that which
the Secretary of State considers important. His letter says,
"On the information so far available to the Secretary Of State the following
are matters which the Secretary of State wishes to be informed about for the
purposes of his consideration of the application:
(a) whether an element of affordable housing should be provided on
the application site as part of the proposed development. In particular,
how the proposal relates to the current and emerging development
plan policies on this issue, to PPG3 and circular 6/98 "Planning
and Affordable Housing" and how it relates to the Governments objective
to encourage mixed and inclusive communities.
(b) the suitability of the design and scale of the proposal (PPG1)
having regard to the Twickenham Riverside Conservation Area (PPG15)
and the impact on and views from the River Thames (RPG3b).
(c) any other relevant matters"
Please write: all letters do count.
If you want a response from the Planning Inspectorate sent to you,
please remember to include your address.
20 June 2002
Press Release: Biodiversity
study of Twickenham Poolsite
While the site has lain undisturbed, it has become home to a variety
of endemic and exotic plant species. Further research and modelling
is required, and these findings underscore the need for an Environmental
Impact Assessment of the site (which the previous Council refused
to carry out). Full report...
24 May 2002
Briefing Paper for LBRuT
Council
The TRT Group's full submission to Cllr Tony Arbour, to assist in
preparation of the new Council's Review Report on the Riverside
Golden Jubilee Park?
Speaking at the supper after the first full Council
meeting since the election, the new Council Leader Tony Arbour
said, "The Conservative Group didn't support the scheme for Twickenham
Riverside. It is a matter of record that the Conservatives wanted
to see a public open space on the site, as an interim stage to
a different type of development. In the year of the Queen's Golden
Jubilee, a park would provide a much requested public amenity."
For reports of the speech, see Twickenham-online's articles:
'Richmond
Council's "preferred option" under scrutiny' and
'Richmond
will be a beacon'
|
27 April 2002 - REVISED RIVERSIDE
PROPOSALS:
The Need for a Review of Proposals |
|
|
As the Dawnay Day scheme may now be "called in" by
the Secretary of State, the Terrace Garden Group, in consultation
with the Co-ordination Group representing the wide range of interested
groups and societies who object to the decision of the Council to
approve the Dawnay Day scheme, we have decided to review and update
the Alternative Scheme for a public garden. |
We have concentrated on reducing the initial
capital cost of bringing the old Swimming Baths site back into public
use.
By this method an opportunity for public and private investment can
be created within a framework that can accommodate many of the ideas
put forward during the consultation and working group sessions prior
to the Dawnay Day scheme being submitted for Planning approval.
Ideas and Vision |
|
|
The basic concept remains that of providing a landscaped
terrace garden, that is accessible and safe for public use, but also
provides serviced (water /electricity) locations for cafe, bar or
shopping or other activities to operate from the site in a temporary
or flexible way.
We have endeavoured to retain the essential elements of the Pool
site that make it unique. |
New views and vistas of the Thames and
Twickenham Riverside will be revealed when the existing first floor
parts of the Old Baths Building are removed and remodelled to provide
the Terrace. The existing functional toilets are retained, as are
the existing Bath House and Pool Restaurant buildings, so that incoming
café or bar operators can renovate them.
The pool itself can either be filled to provide a paved and grass
area, or only partially filled with the material removed from the
pool buildings, or even dredged from the river, to form a sunken
garden that with limited additional investment could become an open
air auditorium.
The ideas illustrated also show how the area at the end of Water
Lane could be paved to make the area more pedestrian friendly.
Ease of public access is essential from all directions. New steps
and ramps are provided as part of the general repair works to the
retaining walls and other structures around the site.
Cost and Funding
This revised approach is based on a minimum-cost enabling works contract
that prepares the site for future activities which will be offered
reduced rentals on the basis of the incoming operator investing in
temporary facilities, be they tents or lightweight structures.
Details of the costings and potential income are being worked on,
but the initial capital cost of the demolition and construction works
can be reduced to significantly less than half the previous estimate.
We believe this could make the scheme viable provided the site remains
in public or charitable ownership.
Other parts of the scheme could be achieved by sponsorship, lottery
type funding or by organisations with there own funds but needing
a location for their accommodation needs.
BULLETIN, 28th FEBRUARY, 2002:
At their meeting on 28th February, Richmond
upon Thames Council's Development Control Committee APPROVED the
proposed Dawnay Day development.
Article 14: Before the meeting began,
it was announced that the Government Office for London, which deals
with London planning matters within the Department for Transport,
Local Government and the Regions, has requested that, should planning
permission be granted, all the papers relating the development
be sent in so it can evaluate whether to call
the development in for a full public inquiry. This was done
under Article 14: click
here for details.
A full report on the meeting is on Twickenham
Online.
Opposition: Seventeen members of
the local community spoke against the scheme, showing clearly how
the it fails to meet many planning regulations for the conservation
area and the riverside (including not providing 40% affordable
housing). It also contravenes the conditions set out in the 1991
Marks & Spencer Inquiry report.
Seven spoke for it, of whom only
one has not at some stage been directly involved with the Council
or the Developer.
David Barnes, the Council's Chief
Planning Officer then responded. His
summary is here. It warrants careful reading.
The Council's
minutes of the meeting.

Newsletter 15 February 2002:
ACTIONS REQUIRED BEFORE 28TH FEBRUARY
DEVELOPERS REVISE SCHEME INTO TWO PHASES -
NEW STRATEGY
The Dawnay Day planning application was revised on the 4th February.
It comprises a new 29-page Supplementary Planning Statement. The
most significant factor in this is the proposal to phase the work
so that the building work flats, fitness centre, cinema, are Phase
1 and the environmental works are Phase 2. It is now possible for
there to be 95% restaurants and bars on the site ground floor. This
new planning strategy by the developers gets over their problems
of sorting out the parking and the provision of certain public amenities
such as the toilets, pontoon and landscape works which actually comprise
most of the public asset.
Everyone who wrote to the Council planning office objecting to
the original plans should have been already notified in writing of
this revision. It is understood that the rules provide for a period
of 21 days for replies to be made objecting to the new proposals.
Therefore, to meet the scheduled decision date of 28 Feb, everybody
who objected first time round should have been notified by 7 Feb.
If not, then take it up NOW with:
Mr David Barnes
Planning & Building Control Division
LB of Richmond on Thames, Civic Centre
44 York Street Twickenham TW1 3B
Fax No 8891 7702
Email: envprotection@richmond.gov.uk
The Council's Planning department is currently preparing its report
and recommendations on the revised Dawnay Day Application. The
Council has scheduled a meeting of its Development Control Sub-Committee
for 28th February to make the decision on this application. If
approved, the Council will sign a private contract with Dawnay
Day Structured Finance Ltd, their preferred partner. By not seeking
the highest price by going out to public tender, the public benefit
claimed in this scheme would need to be shown to be equal to the
land value.
However, the Application can be called in before this date by The
Secretary of State who would then set up a public enquiry, as was
done in 1991 for an earlier planning proposal. Many residents as
individuals and as groups have written to the Secretary of State
requesting he call it in. One of the joint requests has been supported
in its documentation by signatories from The Conservative and Labour
Leaders on the Council, the Green Party, The Twickenham Society,
and The River Thames Society.
We would urge anyone concerned about the future of the Twickenham
riverside to write without delay to The Secretary of State:
Requesting that this planning application 01/2584/FUL and 01/2583/CAC
be called in to be determined by his Department on the basis that:
(a) the Twickenham Riverside is of significant importance /
benefit to everyone (not only to the immediate locality)
(b) the Twickenham Riverside and its historic conservation area
requires sympathetic landscaping and architecture
(c) the Twickenham Riverside has become a matter of major regional
controversy
(d) Development may be in conflict with national policies on important
matters
Letters, Emails, and Faxes should be addressed to:
The Secretary of State for Environment, Transport and the Regions
Government Office for London (Planning Casework N, S&W)
Riverwalk House 9th Floor
157-161 Millbank
London SW1P 4RR
Fax 020 72173471
Email: Kholman.gol@go-regions.gsi.gov.uk
THIS NEW REVISION TO THE DEVELOPERS' SCHEME MAKES IT MORE IMPORTANT
THAN EVER TO WRITE TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE
IF YOU HAVE NOT DONE SO, PLEASE DO IT NOW BEFORE THE 28TH FEB
TWISTING THE TRUTH
The Council has claimed that their current proposals are based
on extensive consultation with local amenity groups. There were
indeed three working parties, two of which prepared comprehensive
recommendations to the Council for the development of the riverside.
(The third working party was wound up before it could deliver
its report.) But their efforts have been largely ignored, as
have the basic plans and agreed brief. The present provision
of 46 flats and the density of the buildings are even greater
than the earlier Alsop Zogolovitch scheme, which was rejected
as overbuilding the site.
The Lib Dem leader on the Council Serge Lourie's claim that "the
council plans were entirely based on these consultations" has
been publicly repudiated by the chairmen of the working parties
which did report.
THE COUNCIL'S PLAN
Most people who are concerned about the fate of the Twickenham
riverside will be aware that the Council's intention is to award
the site to a property development company, Dawnay Day Structured
Finance Ltd, and to grant them permission to erect four blocks
of four and five stories including forty six apartments of some
4000 sq metres with private gardens and exclusive parking, and
2000 sq metres of retail premises, and another 3000 sq metres for
a private fitness club, its pool, and an arts cinema. If planning
permission is granted, the property developers will probably sell
on the site to a building group - THUS MAKING MILLIONS AND MILLIONS
OF POUNDS FROM THE LAND.
On previous unsuccessful developers scheme, advisors to the Council
cautioned: "Funding of the scheme is a particularly important
issue as it not only affects the cost of borrowing to develop the
scheme but also the investment yields, the Developers profit and
ultimately, the viability of the scheme and value of the Council's
land interest.
As the funder is often the end purchaser of the scheme from the
developer the funder effectively becomes the third partner to the
transaction. It is therefore essential to ensure that the best
funding party is selected both in terms of securing best value
and the successful implementation of the scheme."
Nothing is known of the third party to the current proposed
deal, the funder, on who so much depends! Yet, Dawnay Day Structured
Finance Ltd, the Council's preferred partner, is now applying for
planning permission on the 28 February.
AND WE GET IN RETURN?
A few carrots, such as paying to use the pool of a private members
fitness club which will be available only on weekdays for community
use, school parties, OAP swimming sessions, ladies only swimming,
family swimming etc. from 10am to 12am and 2pm to 5pm. Paying
entry admission to an underground art cinema, and the community
use of one of its screens for limited periods. The majority of
the receipt from the sale of the public land will be used to
pay for the building and the use of these carrots.
The lease is for 125 years. Are we prepared to wait for more than
a hundred years to get our Public Trust land back, but even before
then, what happens when the owners of the luxury flats apply for
their freeholds?
And as a final sweetener, the developers are proposing to pay
the Council a one-off sum of £750,000 for the site (not
much more than the cost of one semi detached house in some parts
of the Borough) or not much less than the expected price of
just one of the 46 flats which they will build on the site.
With such planning permission, the site has a value certainly in
excess of £12 million
WHO ARE WE?
We are residents from across the Borough with one aim: TO KEEP
THE TWICKENHAM RIVERSIDE AS PUBLIC LAND. We represent the local
community that does not want the land to go to developers for
the building of 46 luxury flats and associated commercial use.
For this purpose we have obtained planning permission to transform
the area into a riverside park and gardens, utilising part
of the existing structure to form a terrace overlooking the river.
The site would thus retain its use for public leisure and entertainment,
and could be used also for open-air activities such as theatre,
music, and even outdoor skating in the winter. The last of which
could partly compensate for the Council's decision some years
ago, which resulted in the Richmond Ice Rink being replaced by
luxury flats. Occasional events such as farmers markets could
be staged in front of the terrace. Amenities would be housed
in arches under the terrace. THIS PLANNING APPROVED SCHEME MEANS
THAT THE RIVERSIDE WOULD BE KEPT IN PUBLIC OWNERSHIP IN PERPETUITY
FOR YOU AND YOUR CHILDREN TO ENJOY
YOU BE THE JUDGE
A fair indication of the value of the site can be readily made
by comparison with another riverside site, the Three Pigeons
Pub site in Richmond. It was sold on the open market two years
ago for £3.75 million, and with a 10% increase in land
values since then, it would be now be worth more than £4
million.
The Three Pigeons site is currently being built with 14 apartments
on it, whereas the Twickenham Riverside is planned to have 46
apartments of 4000 sq m plus 2000 sq m of retail and catering units,
plus another 3000 sq m for the fitness club and its pool, and
a further 2000 sq m of cinema. Even allowing for a possible difference
in the apartment sizes, it is evident that a figure of £12
million is a very conservative estimate for the value of the Twickenham
site.
LOSS OF PARKING
Parking in central Twickenham is difficult enough at the moment,
but it will get very much worse, as the developers scheme will
do away with some 80 spaces presently available on the embankment,
and this is on top of the 50 spaces which were lost when the
adjacent car park in Water Lane was sold. So, far from encouraging
people to come to Twickenham, they will find it more difficult,
especially families and the elderly wishing to enjoy the riverside.
Yes, there may be some parking under the block of apartments,
but of course this will be exclusively designated for owners
of the flats and shop staff.
ELECTION IMMINENT
With Council elections taking place on 2nd May of this year, it
is quite wrong for the incumbent Council to make a decision on
such an important planning application, with which it has been
so closely associated, for the future of Twickenham and its Riverside.
It is even more inappropriate to try and push this through in
its last few weeks of tenure. All residents should have the opportunity
to raise this matter with their local Councillors, and then vote
accordingly.
We are completely non-political, with no political axe to grind,
and with only one aim: to demand that the Council, whatever its
politics, KEEPS OUR RIVERSIDE FOR US and does not betray the trust
handed to it by earlier Councils.
PROJECT NEWS Update 2 December 2001
Enquires from Riverside Terrace Scheme [TRT]
blocked by Council
Work on the Riverside Terrace Scheme has been hampered
by the Council's Policy of dealing only
with the selected partner ie the Dawnay Day developers.
To ascertain exactly the present ownership details of the site
(which the Council acquired in 1924 for
public use) and other matters relating to the Deeds, the
TRT, requested information and received a letter from Legal Services
at the Council, refusing to supply any such further information
on the grounds that 'officers have been briefed to deal only with
the selected partner'.
The TRT then wrote to the Chief Executive of the Council, Ms Gillian
Norton, requesting a meeting. Ms Norton informed the TRT that she
had referred the matter to Mr Hancock, the Council Officer with
responsibility for the scheme (an Officer who it is understood
is leaving shortly). A summary of Mr Hancock's reply is as follows:
The Council, since it is the landowner, is proceeding with the
preferred developer. Substantial Public consultation has already
taken place. The proposals are designed to deliver the public benefits
and assets already identified in public documents.
He goes on to claim that the proposals have been exhibited
to the public via the planning process:
All members of the public are free to comment on the proposals
by visiting the planning department (or Library). No publicity
will be provided for any scheme other than the Dawnay Day. Council
officers are employed to implement Council policy. Legal services
will respond with answers when the officer returns from leave.
Despite the assurances mentioned above, the submitted Dawnay Day
Planning Application fails to include the significant public benefits
described in the brief as A River Pontoon
and Landing Stage. However, the Council advise that these
facilities are still intended. Further, with regard to Environmental
improvements to the Embankment, Water Lane, and Wharf Lane,
these are all described in the planning application as not essential
to the development and implementation subject to funds being
available.
Three acres of unique Riverside public land for £750,000?
In The Richmond & Twickenham Times 2 Nov, Cllr. Serge Lourie claimed
that the Dawnay Day Development "will produce more public benefit
than the value of the land, and in addition will provide at least £750,000
to be spent on projects around Twickenham."
On behalf of the Riverside Terrace Scheme, Mr Peter Boardman challenged
the so-called benefits as illusory, and went on to point out that "£750,000
is the price of a semidetached house in several parts of Twickenham,
and to speak of that as a significant benefit in exchange for the
development of three acres of prime riverside land is quite ridiculous."
The value of the site to Dawnay Day can be readily calculated as
one third of the sale value of the finished development. This is
because developers estimate, as a rule of thumb: one third for construction
costs, one third for land and one third for profit and finance costs.
With 46 luxury flats, leisure club, cinema and retail areas the final
value must be at least £30m, with the land therefore worth £10m.
This however is likely to be a low estimate, particularly as Riverside
land allows higher residential prices and is usually worth 40% of
the final value ie £12 million. The £750,000 plus the questionable
benefits claimed by the Council is therefore totally out of line
with the value of the land.
Twickenham Riverside Terrace: The Residents'
scheme
To ensure that this beautiful and unique riverside site does not
pass from public to private use (such a change could never be reversed).
The Riverside Terrace plan, created in response to the demands of
Twickenham residents, won planning approval in July. It is
low key and totally in keeping with the riverside surroundings. It
recycles some of the existing buildings on site; the first floor
of the old pool buildings makes a large terrace with balustrade overlooking
the river and the lower part is used for riverside facilities, such
as a café, boat hire, information centre and public toilets.
The terrace leads onto a landscaped open park / garden, with places
to sit and areas for children to play, while at the same time preserving
the mature Hornbeam trees on site and incorporating new plants.
The Riverside Terrace & Garden will be Twickenham's new heart; a
place for everyone to appreciate our unique and beautiful riverside.
"Inappropriate Development of Riverside" say
GLA Green Party
Mr Darren Johnson, Leader of the Green Party on the Greater London
Council, visited the derelict baths site on 30 Nov, where he met
representatives of the TRT.
He said "It is incomprehensible that the Liberal Democrat Council,
who often trumpet their environmental credentials have chosen to
promote the Dawnay Day development in preference to the residents
Terrace Scheme."
He was very supportive of the residents' wishes and said that he
hoped to raise the issue at the General Assembly in his conviction
that the Mayor would be interested in such a sensitive riverside
site.
Environmental Issues - not fully considered by
Dawnay Day ???
| |
Has an Environmental Impact
Assessment been submitted by the
developers? |
| |
Has the risk of flooding,
according to Directive PPG25, been fully addressed? |
| |
The site is a conservation
area, but would the existing trees,
especially the Hornbeams that are all protected by order,
survive the extensive building and construction of the developers'
scheme? |
No Guarantees for continued Public Use of Pool
or Public Arts space
Richmond Council's main public benefit argument in favour of the "commercial
/ residential development" of the Twickenham Riverside cannot be
guaranteed, as the operator in agreement with the Council, would
have the annual decision whether or not to allow limited public use
of the pool and limited free community use of one of the three cinema
auditoriums. The continued provision of these facilities will not
be guaranteed.
With the Dawnay Day Commercial / residential scheme, the public use
of the pool and cinema would be:
| * |
The pool use would be reviewed annually.
The operator could then decide, together with the Council,
to change any agreed public access times and / or entrance
charges. |
| * |
The pool would only be open to the
public at off peak times during weekdays, and on weekend afternoons,
but even this restricted arrangement has not been confirmed. |
| * |
Use of the pool by unaccompanied
children is still not confirmed. |
| * |
The limited free access schedule
for the cinema auditorium / public arts space would be reviewed
annually. The operator could then decide, together with the
Council, to change the amount of access and availability. |
| * |
The Council would pay the operators
of the Pool, and Cinema auditorium for the public access (in
addition to pool entrance charges). The value of the payment
for the public access would be factored against the lease values
on the redeveloped site. |
Moreover, far from being a remote outcome, present doubts on the
general economy and also environmental considerations could well
influence the developers to retain the structural option to convert
the fitness centre, pool and cinema areas to other uses at some future
date. Likewise, the retail shops could be redeveloped as luxury accommodation
at a later stage if they fail to attract sufficient revenue from
letting.
Handing over the ownership of the riverside to the developers and
operators, with no long-term guarantees, means losing any real control
of its use and access forever. And the benefits to the public would
be minimal.
The wishes of the Residents can be implemented
Last month, residents of Petersham won a 125 year renewable lease
on Petersham Meadows safeguarding its future against development.
This was an inspiring victory for the community, the environment
and for future generations. Members of the TRT committee have met
Christopher Brasher, the Chairman of the Petersham Trust who said, "that
it had taken ten years and a lot of hard work".
But people in Twickenham have been working and campaigning for twenty
years for our riverside site.
The crunch time is NOW to make our
wishes felt, because in January the commercial development comes
up for approval, and next May when there are Council elections.
Mr Brasher was quoted as saying, as he looked around at the meadow, "this
really is the essence of Richmond".
Hopefully, when we look at the Riverside site
in a year's time and say, "this really is the essence of Twickenham",
we are looking at the Terrace & Park / Garden for the residents of
Twickenham and not at some intensive luxury commercial development,
built on our Riverside - and given away for ever.
Actions TO BE TAKEN BY YOU NOW if you wish to
keep your Riverside
If you have not already done so, object NOW
to the Dawnay Day planning application of 28 Sept 2001 Ref 01/2584/FUL & 01/2583/CAC
to develop the old swimming bath site on Twickenham Riverside, by
letter / fax / email to:
David Barnes
Planning & Building Control Division
LB of Richmond on Thames, Civic Centre
44 York Street Twickenham TW1 3B
Fax No 020 8891 7702
Email: envprotection@richmond.gov.uk
Write to your local councillor NOW
protesting against the Dawnay Day Scheme and ask him / her to support
the Riverside Terrace Scheme Ref. 01/0540/FUL if you wish it to be
implemented.
Encourage your neighbours / residents' groups / local associations to
do similar, and make them aware of the critical time scale, and to
do something now.
Write to the editors of the Richmond and Twickenham Times and
other local press voicing your opinion for and against the two
schemes.
Equally important as writing to the Council
is to write NOW to the Secretary of State requesting that this
planning application 01/2584/FUL and 01/2583/CAC be called in to
be determined by his Department on the basis that:
| (a) |
the Twickenham Riverside is
of significant importance / benefit to everyone (not only to
the immediate locality) |
| (b) |
the Twickenham Riverside and
its historic conservation area requires sympathetic landscaping
and architecture |
| (c) |
the Twickenham Riverside has
become a matter of major regional controversy |
| (d) |
Development may be in conflict
with national policies on important matters |
Letters, Emails, and Faxes should be addressed
to:
The Secretary of State for Environment, Transport and the Regions
Government Office for London (Planning Casework N, S&W)
Riverwalk House 9th Floor
157-161 Millbank
London SW1P 4RR
Fax 020 72173471
email: kholman.gol@go-regions.gsi.gov.uk
The Planning Officer's Report on the Terrace
Scheme
The recommendation that the project receive planning permission is
available here, with agreement from the
author. The report is in Adobe Acrobat format and it may take a little
while to download.
More information on the Twickenham Riverside Terrace can be seen
on the Twickenham
Rivercentre website, with the results of the consultations and
residents' letters to the Council opposing the Dawnay Day scheme.
Further letters and debate supporting the Riverside Terrace can be
seen on Twickenham
Online
To contact us, email
us, or fill in our form and post it to
us, to go onto the mailing list.
^top |
|