Twickenham Riverside Terrace Group (TRTG)

Home page

Contact us

Twickenham online - Latest news

Twickenham River Centre

The Council's Riverside website

NEWSLETTER

Our mission

ARCHIVE:
2005 Archive
2004 Archive
2003 Archive
2002 Archive

Meeting 15 Oct 2001

DESIGNS:
Nov 2003
Oct 2003
Dec 2002
Apr 2002
Mar 2002


Letters

Ken Hathaway

Other sites:

Twickenham online

Multimap site photo

Thames online

2006 Archive

4 December, 2006

Council Press release on the Partnership Pledge over Plans to Regenerate Former Pool Site. This confirms the Council's support for the River Centre, as devised by the Environment Trust for Richmond upon Thames. Read the full press release.


9 August, 2006

TRTG Leaflet - being handed out at the Children's Playground, Twickenham Poolsite

Did you know?
This is not a permanent playground. It has no definite future, and could be closed at any time by the Council. Please support our campaign to keep it open.

What is going on?
This site was bought by the Council in 1924 for public use. It was a swimming pool until 1980. Then it was closed, and has been derelict until last year, when this playground and café were built, with the suggestion that they could remain until 2009.

What has been proposed? There have been several schemes for commercial development of this site. But they were opposed, so the Government appointed an Inspector to make recommendations. The Inspector's report said that this area should remain a public open space, respecting the conservation nature of the site, and also providing public toilets.

The new Council leader has promised to honour these recommendations.

What now? The playground still has no secure future. Please sign our petition asking the Council to keep the playground here permanently, and to make the rest of this riverside site a public open space.

For more information, email mail@twickenhamriver.org.uk

Twickenham Riverside Terrace Group

LETTER TO OUR SUPPORTERS - 9 July, 2006

Dear Supporter

Councils come and go but the TRTG remains, dedicated to its campaign to restore Public Open Space to the Twickenham Riverside Pool Site, after 26 years of neglect.

We have had success,helping to stop several inappropriate Commercial Development schemes. Do not forget that the present popular Children's Playground and Café on 20% of the site are short term and are planned to be removed at any time between now and 2009.

Serge Lourie, the new leader of the Council, has stated that the Council will abide by the Government Inspector's Report on the site. The Inspector recommended:-

  1. The restoration of the requirement to provide public conveniences;
  2. More explicit emphasis on the provision of public open space as the predominant feature of any redevelopment scheme; and
  3. The requirement that the planning brief for the redevelopment of the site indicate
    1. the extent of the public open space to be provided, which should be immutable irrespective of the time scale of any proposals; and
    2. the characteristics of the Conservation Area which justify its designation and to which new development should have regard.
The fight to implement these recommendations is just beginning, now is the time to:-
  1. Sign and obtain the support of your friends and neighbours for the attached petition which asks the Council to give an undertaking that the Playground and Café be kept open up to and beyond 2009 and that the whole site will be kept as Public Open Space (.pdf, 1 page).
  2. Help by coming to our monthly meetings. Please send us your E mail address to mail@twickenhamriver.org.uk and we will keep you informed.
Our immediate priorities are :-
  1. To keep the present Children's Playground and Café, open.
  2. Persuade the Council to return the remaining 80% of the derelict pool site to public use as public open space.
  3. Stop the present waste of public money by the Council on preparations for a commercial sell off.

For and on behalf of the Twickenham Riverside Terrace Group
John Reekie, Chairman
Twickenham Riverside Terrace Group - a community Group of Local Residents

(posted 9 August)


6 May, 2006

The future of Twickenham Riverside Twickenham Riverside: Terrace Group comment on the Political Parties' future plans for The Twickenham Riverside Pool site and the Embankment.

The Richmond Environmental Information Centre's hustings meeting on Wednesday, 26 April, at St Mary's Hall, was the only opportunity before the local Council election to question the political parties on their proposals for this site. They can be summarised as follows :-.

  • Support for public open space from both the Labour and Green Party
  • Development of the site by Conservative and Liberal Democrat.

It appears that nothing has been learnt by either of the latter of the importance of heeding the public. The Liberal Democrats after FOUR abortive major development schemes still hanker after a Cinema on this site.

After this meeting the Terrace Group were informed by E mail from the Lib Dem Leader that "There is no possibility of a cinema on the site. Any development on the site will need to be of a modest scale as a result of the latest inspector's views and a cinema is not a starter." Serge Lourie, Lib Dem Leader, 2nd May 2006. See below for the UDP Inspector's views.

The Conservative Party say there is already adequate alternative Public Open space on the river bank, and they will abide by the area development brief. The Twickenham Challenge proposals will be duly considered in terms of the Council's criteria, with an announcement in due course.

Public use history
In 1924, a community-minded Council took the decision to purchase the area between Water Lane, Wharf Lane, The Embankment and King Street for public walks and pleasure purposes. In 1934 the open-air swimming pool was built on the site. From 1980 this site has been unused. Since 2005 an area of approximately 20% of the site now has a very popular children's playground and café.

The Present and the Future The Twickenham Riverside Terrace Group (TRTG) has sent to the Council's officers over 500 copies of a signed letter from parents using the present playground urging its retention beyond 2009, and further open space facilities for all on the remaining derelict site. In addition we have sent a petition with 270 names to the Council.

We consider one of the principal problems working against successfully realising this site's public use potential is the Council's insistence on dividing the pool site from the river embankment and in its allocation of internal departmental responsibility. Sensibly this whole riverside area should come under the parks and open spaces department, but due to plans to lease the site its future is managed by the Property / PFI department of the Council, advised by external consultants. Under this management, expenditure to date, currently running at around £10,000 per week, will need to be recouped in the future, making development inevitable.

The TRTG will continue to fight for the return of this site to public open space. The maintenance and upkeep of public open space is not costly. Added to other open space in the local townscape its cost shrinks to insignificance. It behooves on each Council to keep its public open space use inviolate, particularly when that open space is Twickenham's central environmental access to the pleasant banks of the Thames. It could be the main attraction, increasing visitor numbers to the town, and a key element in the regeneration of the town for its traders, and for its residents, young and old, now and in particular for a more green future.

The future of Twickenham is tied to the environment. The reason people visit and live here is because of its river and green open space. Open space on the river bank is at a premium. Travel along the Thames and see the massive development of flats that now forms a concrete jungle lining its banks and realise that the alternative, of public use and access, must be ensured for Twickenham.

As the Council is aware, the Unitary Development Plan Inspector's recommendations for this site are:-

  1. The restoration of the requirement to provide public conveniences.
  2. More explicit emphasis on the provision of public open space as the predominant feature of any redevelopment scheme ; and
  3. The requirement that the planning brief for the redevelopment of the site indicate
    1. the extent of the public open space to be provided, which should be immutable irrespective of the time scale of any proposals; and
    2. the characteristics of the Conservation Area which justify its designation and to which new development should have regard.

It beggars belief that after over 25 years the governing parties are still not prepared to listen to public opinion, or consider future generations. Given today's environmental issues the decision taken in 1924 should remain sacrosanct. It will remain our purpose to work to correct this view.

(posted 30 April)


30 March, 2006

A message to all our supporters - Twickenham Riverside Pool Site

The Council has decided to extend the public consultation period for the 3 Challenge proposals,which will occupy 15-20% of the site to the 14 April 06. It is understood that there are over 250 comments to date, which represents a considerable degree of interest by the public to these proposals.

Full details costing, plans, with information on what Challenge proposal provides are obtainable from the Council Offices or web site.

If any supporter has any view on these 3 Challenge proposals please make it known to the Council before April 14th. You can email the Council by clicking on this link.

The future of Twickenham Riverside will be an election issue, and in January we wrote to all parties asking for their views on this important local issue. Their replies are summarised as follows:-

Official Conservative policy is not known.
It is understood from Conservative publicity that it is proud of the playground and café, but fails to mention its planned removal in 2009.

Official Labour Party policy:
Develop Twickenham Riverside into a public open space with facilities for all age groups.

Official Liberal Democrat policy is not known. It is understood from Liberal Democrat Councillors for the Twickenham Riverside ward that they are in favour of keeping the playground and café but are less clear about the remaining site.

The Green Party candidate supports the use of the whole site as public open space and the River Centre proposal by the Richmond Environment Trust.

We are also pressing for clarification of the Council's long term plans for both the existing playground and café and the remaining 80-85% of the site area which is still not used.

We have already delivered over 200 letters from families using the playground and café to the Council requesting retention of both playground & café beyond 2009 and the use of the remaining site as public open space.

When we receive any official clarification from the Conservative, Labour, Liberal Democrat parties we will keep you informed.


2 March, 2006

THE REAL CHALLENGE
Twickenham Riverside Terrace Group's comment on the Challenge proposals

Introduction
In 1924, a community-minded Council took the decision to purchase the area between Water Lane, Wharf Lane, The Embankment and King Street for public walks and pleasure purposes. In 1934 the open-air swimming pool was built on the site. From 1982 this site has been unused. Since 2005 an area of approximately 25% of the site now has a very popular children's playground and café. The majority of families using this amenity are in favour of retaining its use beyond 2009.

The Twickenham Riverside Terrace Group's (TRTG) avowed purpose is to restore the whole site to public use as public open space, an open air Jubilee Gardens, similar to Radnor Gardens, terraced as Richmond Bridge waterfront. There is no objection to a community building on part of the site. That is a building, which caters for the needs of the general public young and old and is in scale with the open-air amenity of the site.

Open space for public use is enshrined in local and nationwide tradition. The maintenance and upkeep of public open space is not costly, added to other open space in the local townscape its cost shrinks to insignificance. It behooves on each Council to keep its public open space use inviolate, particularly when that open space is Twickenham's central access to the precious banks of the Thames and should be the main attraction to increase visitor numbers to the town, and the key element in the regeneration of the town, for its traders, and for its residents, young and old, now and in the future. TRTG does not agree that the way to achieve this is by residential and other appropriate enabling development.

Council Strategy
The present Council claims to have a 3 stage Strategy:

  • Stage 1 - A temporary playground and Café.
  • Stage 2 - The "Twickenham Challenge" which earmarks 15 to 20% of the whole site for an outside body to provide a community facility at no cost to the Council for a peppercorn rent.
  • Stage 3 - The final development of the remaining 80 to 85% of the site financed by residential and other appropriate enabling development (Cabinet 22/4/05).
The Twickenham Challenge
These proposals will be in the public domain for 1 month for public comment. This considering the volume of information offered for each proposal is an inadequate time period for the proper appraisal of the three proposals now put forward.
These are:
  • Busen Martial Arts centre (B)
  • Duke of Edinburgh Award building (E)
  • River Centre (RC)

The Council says it will appraise these according to its own criteria of a mix of 20 criteria.

TRTG has used a set of 5 criteria, as follows:

Does it coexist with the present Children's playground and future public open space? All meet this criteria. But dependant on final mass and appearance
Does it provide a service /facility for the whole of the community young and old? Only RC meets this criteria
Is the Challenge building dependant on a Riverside location? Could it just as well be built elsewhere in Twickenham? Only RC meets this criteria
Funding All rely on outside grants voluntary funding, Lottery grants etc
(B £2.8 million)
(E £4.2 million)
(RC £2.7 million)
Assessment of viability.  We have reservations for all 3 with regard to their ability to raise the finance and operating costs.

Recommendation
In view of this appraisal our recommendation is that a more full and detailed consultation is carried out with the local community and its representative groups in order that a consensus of opinion is fully explored. In doing this it should be a considered a viable alternative not to proceed down the path of residential development. To consider and offer the alternative of public open space for the whole site.

After 23 years of the whole site being closed, the community face the strong possibility of further years of delay whilst costly protracted negotiation and fund raising is carried out.

As the Council is aware the Unitary Development Plan Inspector recommended at the public inquiry:

  1. The restoration of the requirement to provide public conveniences.
  2. More explicit emphasis on the provision of public open space as the predominant feature of any redevelopment scheme ; and
  3. The requirement that the planning brief for the redevelopment of the site indicate:
    • the extent of the public open space to be provided, which should be immutable irrespective of the time scale of any proposals; and
    • the characteristics of the Conservation Area which justify its designation and to which new development should have regard.

The power to get a grip of this situation and make the Riverside a truly public open space for all ages with the present amenities in place, is within the grasp of a courageous Council. This is the challenge that should not be shirked due to expediency, lack of will, vision, or understanding, of the present and future benefit to the community of this Riverside site. Its use as public open space particularly when that open space is Twickenham's central access to its unique banks of the Thames. Could be the main attraction to increase visitor numbers to the town, and the key element in the regeneration of Twickenham.

Yours sincerely
Ron Chappell
On behalf of the Committee of The Twickenham Riverside Terrace Group
2 March 06


19 February, 2006

TWICKENHAM CHALLENGE REVEALED

See the Rivercentre website for details and links to the Challengers' documents.

NOTE THAT RESPONSES TO THE CONSULTATION MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE COUNCIL BY 5PM ON FRIDAY, 3 MARCH.


3 February, 2006

Letter to our supporters

While enjoying the new playground, café and toilets on part of the Twickenham Pool Site many of you took part in our letter campaign for the increased and permanent public use of the whole of the Twickenham Pool Site.

This has been an undoubted success. We are now about to follow this up with a request to each of the political parties for their plans for this important amenity site.

Your letter and over 100 others were each sent to the Leader of the Council, the two Council Officers concerned, T Pugh Director of Environment and R Angus Development Control Manager.as well as each of the three ward Councillors representing the address of each sender. From the standard letter which you received in reply from Cllr Arbour you will be aware of the statements on the importance of public open space and that the Council has made it clear that this would be an important element of any scheme. You will also be aware of the planning brief T1 for the Twickenham Pool Site which was enclosed with the letter. This brief refers to housing,cafés,and possible retail.

What is not made clear in Cllr Arbour's letter is that the current Stage 1 of the Council's plans, comprising the existing playground and café with toilets, has planning permission only until June 2009. Therefore, unless the residents of Twickenham make it clear to the Council that they wish otherwise, the present facilities will be removed for ever.

There is also the Council's published strategy which says that the long term proposal will include commercial development- because that is what will finance the regeneration of the site as well as important environmental improvements in the locality. The TRTG suggests that the regeneration is feasible without commercial development, The present playground, café and other landscape amenity were financed out of Council funds. Together with the Challenge this already accounts for 45% of the site. The remaining can be public open space.

What must now be ensured is positive action to implement the community facilities and ensure that the public open space is not just an element, but is the main thrust of the final scheme.

What is also not made clear is what the present Council proposals are for Stage 2 for the site. This is the so called 'Twickenham Challenge' which earmarks 15 to 20% of the whole site for an outside body to provide a community facility at no cost to the Council for a peppercorn rent. The final development of the whole site based on the T1 brief will in turn have to accommodate The Twickenham Challenge which was supposed to have been settled last summer from the then four applicants, but inexplicably this has been delayed.

If you care about the future of Twickenham Pool site and wish for permanent public use of the whole site, including a children's play area, we ask you to assist us in this aim by writing to the present Council and also question all the other political parties on this matter before the forthcoming Council elections in May.

By doing this you can ensure that promises, statements and commitments made by the candidates are honoured and that their plans for the site are fully and openly discussed.

Every candidate should be reminded that, in 1924, a community minded Council took the decision to purchase this riverside area of Twickenham for public walks and pleasure purposes. And, further, it is our duty as residents to keep its public open space use inviolate, particularly when every conceivable piece of the banks of the Thames is being commandeered for commercial purposes.


If you wish to be more involved in this campaign please contact this web site.

The Committee
Twickenham Riverside Terrace Group
3 February 06


For further information or if you would like to comment, please click here to email us

^top